Content at Scale no longer exists under that name. As of 16 August 2026, contentatscale.ai returns an HTTP 301 redirect to brandwell.ai, and BrandWell sells an intent-led go-to-market platform. The free AI content detector survived the move and still works. What you replace depends on which half you were using.
Paste some text or load the example to estimate AI likelihood.
The redirect is the clearest evidence. Requesting contentatscale.ai returns a 301 to brandwell.ai/, and the old deep links follow suit: contentatscale.ai/ai-content-detector/ lands on brandwell.ai/ai-content-detector/, and contentatscale.ai/blog/ lands on brandwell.ai/blog/ (checked 16 August 2026).
The destination is a different kind of company. BrandWell's homepage headline reads "We Reveal Every Active Buyer in Your Market" and the navigation labels the product an "Intent-led GTM platform", built around identifying site visitors, mapping stakeholders at their companies, and syncing those audiences to ad platforms. The AI writing side still exists, grouped under "WriteWell + RankWell" and described in the nav as an "AI writing app". RankWell is presented as an SEO writer that scores drafts before publishing (brandwell.ai, checked 16 August 2026).
So if you came to Content at Scale for long-form AI article generation, that capability is still on sale, under a new name, inside a much larger platform aimed at demand generation. If you came for the free detector, nothing has broken.
The AI Checker at brandwell.ai/ai-content-detector/ works today. The input box is capped at 2,500 characters, with an on-page note reading "Quick Tip: Try more than 250 characters for better results". It accepts pasted text, a fetched URL, or an uploaded file, and ships worked examples labelled [Human], [Human & AI], [GPT4], [ChatGPT] and [BrandWell].
Two statements on that page matter more than the marketing around them. On language: "Currently, the AI Detector is just for the English language." On scoring: "We have simplified the scoring to give you an overall probability of it being written by a human." The page also declines to claim a ranking, noting elsewhere on the site that "there's no universally 'best' tool as accuracy can change with the ongoing evolution of artificial intelligence" (brandwell.ai/ai-content-detector/, checked 16 August 2026).
No accuracy percentage is published for the detector. That is worth saying plainly, because most competitors do publish one and we have no way to compare a number that does not exist.
A promotional panel on the same page offers WriteWell at "$199/year", struck from "$490/year", bundling a "Humanizer Writer", an "AI to Human Rewriter", an "Unlimited AI Content Detector", an "Unlimited Plagiarism Checker" and "40+ AI Writing Agents". WriteWell's own copy on that page is explicit about its purpose, describing content that "bypasses AI detectors". That is BrandWell's framing of its product, quoted as theirs.
For the detector specifically, keep using it if the 2,500 character box fits your work. It costs nothing, it needs no account to try, and it does something none of the paste-box alternatives here do: it will fetch a URL for you. Checking a freelancer's published article without copying text out of a CMS is a small convenience that saves real minutes.
The examples panel is genuinely useful for calibration. Being able to run the same tool over a known-human sample and a known-GPT-4 sample, in two clicks, tells you more about how to read its output than any accuracy claim would.
For the writing side, BrandWell wins on scope in a way no detector vendor competes with. If your actual job is producing SEO articles at volume, scoring them before publish, and now identifying which companies are researching your market, that is one platform doing four jobs. A detection tool does not replace it and should not try to.
And if you are an existing RankWell customer with content already calibrated to a brand voice profile, migration cost is a real argument for staying put regardless of what any comparison table says.
The 2,500 character cap is the wall most people hit. That is roughly 400 words, which is a section, not an article. There is no published API for the free detector, no bulk mode, no exportable report, and no history. Scoring is deliberately simplified to a single human-probability figure, which is fine for a gut check and thin if you need to point at a specific paragraph.
| What you used it for | Where it went | Practical replacements |
|---|---|---|
| Free AI detector | Still live at brandwell.ai/ai-content-detector/, free, 2,500 characters | Keep it for spot checks; move to a tool with file upload or an API for volume |
| Long-form AI article generation | RankWell, inside BrandWell | Stays with BrandWell, or a dedicated SEO writing tool |
| Detection at volume for a content team | Never offered | Detector with bulk scan and an API |
| Detection in another language | Never offered, English only | Detecting AI publishes multi-language support |
| Understanding why a score came out that way | Simplified single probability | Sentence-level tools, or GLTR's research demo for the underlying intuition |
We only do the detection half. There is no article generator here, so if the writing platform was the reason you subscribed, this page is not your answer and RankWell probably is.
For detection, the box above runs an English-only ensemble of DeBERTa, RoBERTa and ELECTRA. It carries a documented false-positive bias against writers who learned English as a second language, which matters most when a score is about to affect a person rather than a draft. BrandWell's detector is also English-only, so neither tool helps you with Spanish or German copy; Detecting AI is the one on this page that publishes multi-language coverage.
The limits are stated rather than discovered. Anonymous checks run 3 a day, pooled across the AI Detector and the Document Detector, capped at 1,000 words, with a 25-word minimum. A free account moves that to 60 checks a day at up to 5,000 words. Results land in three bands: below 30 is "likely human-written", 30 to 69 is "mixed signals", 70 and above is "likely AI-generated".
Paid plans exist for the things a paste box cannot do. Starter is $9.99 a month or $7.49 on annual billing and brings sentence-level analysis, PDF export and 200 checks a day. Pro at $19.99 or $14.99 annual removes the daily cap and adds a Chrome extension, scan history and a REST API. Business at $39.99 or $29.99 annual adds teams and branded reports. Enterprise is $79.99 or $59.99 annual. File upload, URL scanning and bulk scanning run across the paid tiers.
The honest comparison: for one 400-word check, BrandWell's free tool and our anonymous box are close enough that price decides, and both are zero. The difference appears at the fortieth check of the week.
The deeper head-to-head: feature table, where GPTZero wins, where TextSight wins, and migration steps.
Read the comparePerplexity, burstiness, and transformer scoring explained, so you can read any detector's verdict critically.
Read the guideWhy detectors over-flag ESL and formal writing, and how sentence-level evidence helps you defend real work.
Read the guideThe full ranking with detection approach, pricing, and use-case fit side by side.
See the rankingStart with TextSight's free tier. No card, no signup, no commitment. Your first scan in about six seconds, with the evidence shown line by line.
Honest comparisons vs other tools.